Connect with us

Startup

Tax-free parcels rule used by Shein and Temu under review

Published

on

Spread the love

Faarea Masud

Business reporter, BBC News

Getty Images Image of two packages being handed over to someone at a front doorGetty Images

Major retailers have welcomed the government’s review of a rule that allows small parcels to enter the UK duty-free, saying it gives overseas firms such as Shein and Temu an unfair advantage over British businesses.

Former Dragon’s Den star Theo Paphitis, whose retail group includes the Ryman and Robert Dyas chains, told the BBC the measure was ruining UK High Streets.

The rule allows international retailers to send packages to the UK worth less than £135 without incurring import taxes.

But the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said scrapping the exemption, which many small businesses also use, could raise costs for them and their customers.

Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, Mr Paphitis said retailers had been lobbying government “for a very, very long time”, arguing the rule had had devasting impact “on our retail landscape and our high streets”.

He joined the bosses of Sainsbury’s, Currys and the British Retail Consortium in welcoming the government’s consultation on the rule.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday that the government planned to review the customs treatment of low-value products entering the UK, after retailers complained they were being undercut by overseas rivals.

UK businesses bringing in larger shipments have to pay taxes, and they also argue that cheaper goods might fail to meet the same environmental and ethical standards that they keep to.

The so called “de mimimis” rule has received renewed interest after US president Donald Trump scrapped a similar measure in America amid his escalating trade war with China.

Goods worth less than $800 into the US will soon be subject to charges, where they were previously exempt. The move has already prompted Chinese retailers to raise their prices.

In the UK, there are further concerns that China will dump goods here to avoid the tariffs which Trump has imposed on Chinese goods.

Earlier this month, the boss of Currys told the Financial Times that the “single biggest area where lots of stock is likely to land in the UK… is from the likes of Shein, Temu, Alibaba, TikTok shop and, most of all, Amazon marketplace”.

In response to the government’s review, the chair of the Federation of Small Businesses, Tina McKenzie, said: “It’s right to be concerned about potential future dumping of goods, as escalating tariffs applied by bigger global blocs against each other may mean a surge in goods arriving in markets like our own.

But she added that the government should proceed with caution in its de minimis consultation.

“With 16% of goods moved by small firms sitting below the £135 threshold, a decision to scrap it impacts on trading and inflation,” she said.

Measures such as de mimimis were good for small and medium businesses, she added, and scrapping it might “ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers.”

But Mr Paphitis told the BBC it was “absolute nonsense” that the measure keeps inflation and prices down, as it led to a loss of jobs and tax revenue for the UK, as businesses lost out from trying to compete with cheaper foreign rivals.

Helen Dickinson, the chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, welcomed the government consultation and said it showed Reeves was listening to retailers.

“A review of this policy, which was designed to reduce the burden on low volume, low value imports, was already needed.

“With retailers seeing a rise in the number of potentially non-compliant products entering the UK market, it’s even more critical now,” she said.

When Sainsbury’s announced their latest financial results earlier this month, boss Simon Roberts called on the government to act as soon as possible.

“Everyone should pay their tax… so if there’s a loophole here which means that’s not happening then that needs to be closed so it’s a level playing field for everybody” he said.

Startup

Watchdog warns allergy sufferers about Dubai chocolate

Published

on

By

Spread the love

The UK food watchdog has warned people with allergies not to buy imported Dubai chocolate if they have any doubts about ingredients because of different labelling standards.

The Food Standards Agency’s chief scientific advisor said shoppers should stick to “trusted” retailers in the UK as the products they sell are more likely to be made for the domestic market.

Dubai chocolate has become hugely popular fuelled by so-called “influencers” on TikTok, leading UK supermarkets such as Waitrose and Lidl to impose per person limits to meet demand.

But a recent investigation by the BBC found several TikTok Shop users selling food without listing allergen information.

UK businesses are legally required to declare if a product they sell contains one of the 14 regulated allergens – including nuts and milk.

The FSA found some imported Dubai-style chocolate products may not have been intended for sale in the UK and therefore lack a full ingredients list or allergen labelling that are legally required.

Professor Robin May, the FSA’s chief chief scientific advisor, said: “Some imported Dubai-style chocolate products don’t meet our standards and could be a food safety risk, especially for consumers with allergies.”

He added: “As it’s difficult for consumers to tell the difference between products made for the UK and those that aren’t, if you have a food allergy or intolerance, we advise that you do not buy the product unless you’re certain it’s intended for sale here.”

By law, products made to UK standards must have labels that have the ingredients written in English, the name of the food, a best before or use by date, and the name and address of a UK or European Union (EU) business that is responsible for information on the product.

If the food is not from the EU or UK then an importer must be listed.

The FSA said it had worked with local authorities to identify a number of Dubai chocolate products that posed a health risk to consumers with allergies.

It said some of these products may also contain additives and colours which aren’t allowed to be sold in the UK.

The popular treat combines the flavours of chocolate, pistachio and tahini with filo pastry, and is inspired by the Arab dessert Knafeh.

The regulator is now sampling products to work out the scale of the problem.

It said shoppers should report any concerns to their local authority and is working with allergy charities to raise awareness.

Continue Reading

Startup

US inflation ticks higher but tariff impact remains muted

Published

on

By

Spread the love

Prices for toys, car parts and major appliances jumped in the US last month, but the overall impact of Donald Trump’s new tariffs on consumers remained relatively muted.

Inflation, the pace of price increases, picked up to 2.4% in May, rising from 2.3% in April, the Labor Department said.

That came as higher prices for some items were offset by declines in other areas, such as petrol, airfares and clothing.

The monthly report is being closely watched to see how Trump’s moves to raise taxes on imports play out across the world’s largest economy.

Since re-entering the White House in January, Trump has imposed new tariffs on imports from around the world, putting in place a 10% tariff on most items, while targeting goods from some countries and sectors with even higher duties.

Economists have warned that the new levies will raise costs for companies, and lead to higher prices for households, risking the return of an inflation problem that appeared to be subsiding.

But Trump has rejected those predictions, arguing that companies in other countries will shoulder the burden of the new costs, while the tariffs benefit American producers and the wider economy.

For now, the consumer price report indicated that the impact on households remained relatively muted, primarily hitting items – such as appliances, where the US depends heavily on China for supply.

Overall, prices rose just 0.1% from April to May, after rising 0.2% a month earlier.

Analysts, however, said they expected it would take time for the tariffs to work their way into the data.

“Today’s below forecast inflation print is reassuring – but only to an extent,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management.

“Tariff-driven price increases may not feed through to the CPI data for a few more months yet, so it is far too premature to assume that the price shock will not materialise.”

Continue Reading

Startup

Starmer says ‘no blank cheque’ for nuclear project

Published

on

By

Spread the love

Michael Race & Simon Jack

Business reporter & Business editor, BBC News

BBC Sir Keir StarmerBBC

The prime minister has said he is “not writing a blank cheque” to pay for a new UK nuclear power plant, after the government announced it would commit £14.2bn to the project.

Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC the development of Sizewell C on the Suffolk coastline would create 10,000 jobs over the next decade, and provide energy security and independence for the country.

The government has announced the cash injection in a bid to kickstart investment in a new nuclear plant, but the Sizewell C project has faced opposition over its potential cost and environmental impact.

The PM said the plant would “bring down bills for millions of people across the country”.

However, it will take at least 10 years to complete the project with power beginning to be generated in the mid-2030s, according to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, who identified Sizewell as a potential site for a new nuclear reactor in 2009 when Labour was last in government.

UK household bills have increased substantially in recent years, sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine sending global gas and oil prices up over supply fears, especially across Europe.

Sir Keir said the government investment in Sizewell was “setting out a course for the future which means that we have control over our own energy” and would ensure that Russian President Vladimir Putin “cannot put his boot on our throat” with energy prices.

Building a nuclear power station is a huge engineering and financial project. The UK currently has nine nuclear reactors in operation, but the plants are ageing and eight of them are due to close by the end of this decade. The newest nuclear reaction – Sizewell B – came into service some 30 years ago.

Last year, nuclear power provided about 14% of the UK’s electricity, which is significantly less than what was generated by wind (30%) and gas (26%).

But the government has insisted that generating more power from nuclear can cut household energy bills, create jobs, boost energy security so that the UK is less reliant on other countries, and also tackle climate change.

It will hope the backing of Sizewell C will lead to an influx of private investment, which is required for building work to get under way, and is part a wider effort to attract investment into the UK to boost economic growth.

The funding announced on Wednesday, which includes £2.7bn already pledged in the Autumn Budget, only covers five years of a decade-long project.

When this was put to Sir Keir, he said the government had been “absolutely clear” about what it wants to achieve.

“I want to invest in our future. China [and] France are doing this, and I want to be right up there with them.”

‘Private investment not complete’

The government has said Sizewell C will generate enough power for some six million homes.

Its construction will see 10,000 jobs created, and once operational, it is expected to employ 900 people and be in service for 60 years.

However, Alison Downes, director of pressure group Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not “come clean” about Sizewell C’s cost, because “negotiations with private investors are incomplete”.

There have been several different funding announcements made about Sizewell C over many years by different governments.

The Department of Energy Security confirmed to the BBC that with Wednesday’s £14.2bn investment announcement, a total of £17.8bn of taxpayers’ money had been put towards the project to date.

A final decision on the funding model will be taken by the government later in the summer.

Sizewell C has previously said the project was expected to cost £20bn in total, but industry sources have estimated it could cost double that.

EDF, the state-owned French company which is building the new power plant, rejected the claims saying a £40bn figure was “not accurate”.

EDF is also building a new nuclear plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset, which it did accept would cost more than £40bn, compared to a 2022 estimate of £26bn.

Hinkley Point is expected to switch on in the early 2030s, which will be over a decade late and having cost billions more than originally planned.

Map of different power station locations in UK

Trade unions welcomed the government’s investment, with GMB general secretary Warren Kenny saying Sizewell C would provide “thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs”.

Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect union, added: “New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy.”

Sizewell C is to sit immediately north of Sizewell B, which began generating electricity in 1995.

Sizewell A opened in 1967 but it stopped generating power in December 2006 and a lengthy decommissioning process is ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending

© 2024 247News.co.in | All Rights Reserved